Orientación emprendedora en la Policía Federal – estímulos y restricciones a partir de las características organizacionales
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Los organismos policiales han avanzado en la incorporación de procedimientos más eficientes con el fin de mejorar los servicios prestados. En este sentido, cobra relevancia el estudio de la orientación emprendedora y la identificación de características organizacionales que actúan como inductoras o inhibidoras de este comportamiento. La orientación empresarial ha sido poco estudiada en las organizaciones policiales. En ese sentido, el presente trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar la relación entre las características presentes en la organización y la orientación emprendedora de los servidores públicos. Para lograr el objetivo propuesto, se recolectó información primaria de 321 delegados de la Policía Federal a través de un cuestionario estructurado. Los datos se analizaron con análisis factorial exploratorio y análisis de regresión múltiple. Los resultados encontrados muestran la relevancia del liderazgo para la proactividad y para la propensión a asumir riesgos por parte de los delegados. Además, se observó que la provisión de capacitación y capacitación se asoció con la propensión al riesgo, pero no con la proactividad. Contrariamente a lo esperado, la presencia de normas y reglas no resultó ser un obstáculo para la orientación empresarial, sino un estímulo para el riesgo.
Detalles del artículo
Sección
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
La revista tiene derechos exclusivos sobre la primera publicación, impresa y/o digital, de este texto académico, lo que no afecta los derechos de autor del responsable de la investigación.
La reproducción (total o parcial) del material publicado depende de la mención expresa de esta revista como origen, citando el volumen, número de edición y el enlace DOI para la referencia cruzada. Para fines de derechos, se debe registrar la fuente de publicación original.
La utilización de los resultados aquí publicados en otros vehículos de divulgación científica, aunque sea por parte de los autores, depende de la indicación expresa de esta revista como medio de publicación original, so pena de caracterizar una situación de autoplagio.
____________________________________________
Información adicional y declaraciones del autor
(integridad científica)
Declaración de conflicto de interés: Los autores confirman que no existen conflictos de interés al realizar esta investigación y escribir este artículo.
Declaración de autoría: Todos y solo los investigadores que cumplen con los requisitos de autoría para este artículo se enumeran como autores; todos los coautores son totalmente responsables de este trabajo en su totalidad.
Declaración de originalidad: El(los) autor(es) garantiza(n) que el texto aquí publicado no ha sido publicado previamente en otro lugar y que las reediciones futuras sólo se harán con referencia expresa al lugar original de publicación; también certifica que no existe plagio de material de terceros ni autoplagio.
____________________________________________
Archivo y distribución
El PDF final publicado se puede archivar, sin restricciones, en cualquier servidor de acceso abierto, indexador, repositorio o página personal, como Academia.edu y ResearchGate.
Cómo citar
Referencias
AHMAD, N.; DAGHFOUS, A. Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational knowledge networks. European Business Review, 22(2), 153–174, 2010. https://doi.org/DOI10.1108/09555341011023506
ALENCAR, E. Desenvolvendo a Criatividade nas Organizações: O Desafio da Inovação. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 35, n. 6, p. 6–11, 1995. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0034-75901995000600002&script=sci_arttext.
ATTARD, J. et al.; . A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 2015. 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006
BESSANT, J.; TIDD, J.. Inovação e empreendedorismo: administração. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2009.
BRUNO-FARIA, M. de F.; FONSECA, M. V. de A.). Culture of Innovation: Concepts and Theoretical Models. RAC-Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), 18(4), 2014. 372–396. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac20141025.
BRYMAN, A. Social Research Methods, 3. ed., Oxford University Press, 2008.
BURNS, P.. Corporate Entrepreneurship: Building an Entrepreneurial Organization. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008.
CARUANA, A.; EWING, M. T.; RAMASESHAN, B. Effects of some environmental challenges and centralization on the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of public sector entities. Service Industries Journal, 22(2), 43–58, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/714005076
CASTRO, C. M. S. et alAntecedentes de inovações em organizações públicas do poder executivo federal. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 22(71), 2017. 126–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v22n71.63851
CHAN, K. Y. et al.; Who wants to be an intrapreneur? Relations between employees’ entrepreneurial, professional, and leadership career motivations and intrapreneurial motivation in organizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2041. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02041
COELHO, M. L. G. M. M. Intraempreendedorismo e a inovação na gestão pública federal. Revista do Serviço Público, 61(3), 2010. 233–247.
COSTA, A. M.; CERICATO, D.; MELO, P. A. de.. Empreendedorismo corporativo: uma nova estratégia para a inovação em organizações contemporâneas. Revista de Negócios, 12(4), 32–43, 2007.
COSTA FILHO, E.; GOMES, M. A. de; TEIXEIRA, R. M. Ações Empreendedoras Inovadoras no Setor Público. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação, 5(2), 2018. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18226/23190639.v5n2.01
CURADO, C.; MUÑOZ-PASCUAL, L.; GALENDE, J. Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Business Research, 89, 206–215, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.056
DE VRIES, H.; BEKKERS, V.; TUMMERS, L. Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 2016. 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
DEMIRCIOGLU, M. A.; AUDRETSCH, D. B. Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 2017.1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004
EMMENDOERFER, M. L. . Inovação e Empreendedorismo no Setor Público. ENAP: Brasília, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4236805
EMMENDOERFER, M. L. Innovation, Brazil. In A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer., 2019b. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3764-1
EMMENDOERFER, M. L.; VALADARES, J. L.; HASHIMOTO, M. Evidências do empreendedorismo interno em organizações no contexto da inovação. RECADM - Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa, 9(2), 144–156, 2010.. https://doi.org/10.5329/RECADM.20100902002
FERREIRA, V. D. R. S. et al. Inovação no setor público federal no brasil na perspectiva da inovação em serviços. Review of Administration and Innovation - RAI, 12(4), 2015. 99. https://doi.org/10.11606/rai.v12i4.101521
FONSECA, F. A trama conflituosa das políticas públicas: Lógicas e projetos em disputa. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 14, 406–417, 2016. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-395162646
GARCÍABUADES, M. E.; RAMISPALMER, C.; MANASSEROMAS, M. A. Climate for innovation, performance, and job satisfaction of local police in Spain. Policing, 38(4), 722–737, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-02-2015-0019
GASCÓ, M. Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90–98, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.003
HADJIMANOLIS, A. The barriers approach to innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (ed.). The International Handbook on Innovation (pp. 559-573). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50038-3
HANSEN, M. B. Antecedents of organizational innovation: The diffusion of new public management into Danish local government. Public Administration, 89(2), 285–306, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01855.x
HAIR JR, J. F. et al Análise Multivariada de Dados. 6o ed. Bookman Editora, 2009.
HARTLEY, J. Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money & Management, v. 25, n. 1, p. 27–34, 2005.
HÉBERT, R. F.; LINK, A. N.. In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small business economics, 1(1), 39-49, 1989.
HISRICH, R. D. Entrepreneurship / Intrapreneurship. American Psychologist, v. 45, n. 2, p. 209–222, 1990.
HOBBS, D.. Doing the business: Entrepreneurship, the Working Class, and Detectives in the East End of London. Oxford: OPU, 1988.
HOBBS, D.. Business as a Master-Metaphor: Working Class Entrepreneurship and Business Class Policing. In R. Burrows (ed.), Deciphering the Enterprise Culture (pp. 107-125). London: Routledge, 1991.
HORNSBY, J. S et al. An Interactive Model of the Corporate Entrepreneurship Process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, v. 17, n. 2, p. 29–37, 1993.
HUGHES, D. J. et al.. Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 2018. 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
KIM, D.; CHIOU, J. S.; CALANTONE, R. Strategic orientations, joint learning, and innovation generation in international customer-supplier relationships. International Business Review, 27(4), 838–851, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.01.007
KARYOTAKIS, K.; MOUSTAKIS, V. Organizational factors, organizational culture, job satisfaction and entrepreneurial orientation in public administration. The European Journal of Applied Economics, 13(1), 2016. 47–59. https://doi.org/10.5937/ejae13-10781
KEARNEY, C.; HISRICH, R.; ROCHE, F. A conceptual model of public sector corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(3), 295– 313, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-007-0048-x
KEARNEY, C.; HISRICH, R.; ROCHE, F. Public and private sector entrepreneurship: Similarities, differences or a combination? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16(1), 26–46, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000910932863
KEARNEY, C.; MEYNHARDT, T. Directing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy in the Public Sector to Public Value – Antecedents, Components and Outcomes. International Public Management Journal, 19(4), 543–572, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1160013
KIRZNER, I. M.. Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago: CUP, 1983.
KNIGHT, F. H.. Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: August M. Kelley, 1921.
LACERDA, F. M.; BELFORT, A. C.; MARTENS, C. D. P. Manifestação da orientação mpreendedora em uma organização sem fins lucrativos. REGEPE - Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 4(2), 66–95, 2015.
LEE, J. C.; CHEN, C. Y. Exploring the determinants of software process improvement success: A dynamic capability view. Information Development. 31(1), 6-20, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666917724194
LEWIS, J. M.; RICARD, L. M.; KLIJN, E. H. How innovation drivers, networking and leadership shape public sector innovation capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 288–307, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317694085
LEYDEN, D. P.; Link, A. N.. Public sector entrepreneurship: U. S. technology and innovation policy. New York: OPU, 2015.
LUKOSCHEK, C. S. et al.;. Leading to sustainable organizational unit performance: Antecedents and outcomes of executives’ dual innovation leadership. Journal of Business Research, 91, 266–276, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.003
MACHADO, D. D. P. N.; CARVALHO, L. C. de.. Ambiente favorável ao desenvolvimento de inovações: proposição de um modelo de análise organizacional. Revista de Administração, 48(3), 592–607, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1108
MCMULLEN, J. S.; SHEPHERD, D. A. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, v. 31, n. 1, p. 132–152, 2006.
MEYNHARDT, T.; DIEFENBACH, F. E. What Drives Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Public Sector? Evidence from Germany s Federal Labor Agency. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 2012. 761–792. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus013
MORAIS, M. C. A et al.. Meta-Análise da Produção Científica Internacional sobre Empreendedorismo no Setor Público: O que tem sido escrito acerca disso? XXXVI Encontro ANPAD, p. 1–16, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.anpad.org.br/admin/pdf/2013_EnANPAD_APB1645.pdf
MORAIS, M. C. A. et al; (2015). Polissemias do Empreendedorismo no Setor Público. REGEPE - Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 4(1), 26–53, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14211/41200
MORRIS, M. H.; JONES, F. F. Entrepreneurship in Established Organizations: The Case of the Public Sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 71–91, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902400105
MORRIS, M. H.; WEBB, J. W.; FRANKLIN, R. J. Understanding the manifestation of entrepreneurial orientation in the nonprofit context. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(5), 947–971, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00453.x
MÜCELDILI, B.; TURAN, H.; ERDIL, O. The influence of authentic leadership on creativity and innovativeness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 673–681, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.538
MUNRO, J. Accelerating innovation in local government. Public Money ; Management, 35(3), 219–226, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.1027498
NIEVES, J.; HALLER, S. Building dynamic capabilities through knowledge resources. Tourism Management, 40, 224–232, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.010
OHEMENG, F. L. K. The Entrepreneurial Bureaucrat. In A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5
PALMER, D. State police in a state of change: remaking the entrepreneurial officer (Doctoral dissertation, Griffith University), 2005.
PIKKEMAAT, B.; PETERS, M.; CHAN, C. S. Needs, drivers and barriers of innovation: The case of an alpine community-model destination. Tourism Management Perspectives, 25, 2018. 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.11.004
POPA, S.; SOTO-ACOSTA, P.; MARTINEZ-CONESA, I. Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 134–142, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.014
REGO, A. et al.. Hope and positive affect mediating the authentic leadership and creativity relationship. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 2014. 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.10.003
SCHUMPETER, J. A.). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: HUP, 1934.
SEABRA, S. N. A nova administração pública e mudanças organizacionais. Revista de Administração Pública, 35(4), 19–43, 2001.
SECCHI, L. Modelos organizacionais e reformas da administração pública. Revista de Administração Pública, 43(2), 2009.347–369. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122009000200004
SILVA, J. A. DA. (2007) Curso de direito constitucional positivo. 28o ed. São Paulo: Malheiros Editores.
SILVA, M. V. G. et al.. Intraempreendedorismo no Setor Público: Análise do Comportamento Empreendedor de Gestores Públicos Municipais por Meio do Carland Entrepreneurship Index (CEI). REGEPE - Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 7(2), 2018. 67–114. https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v7i2.699
SINGLA, A.; STRITCH, J. M.; FEENEY, M. K. Constrained or creative? Changes in financial condition and entrepreneurial orientation in public organizations. Public Administration, 96(4), 2018. 769–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12540
SMITH, R. The evolution of “entrepreneurial policing”: a review of the literature. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 9(1), 1-20, 2020.. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-03-2019-0005
STEIJN, B.; BEKKERS, V.; EDELENBOS, J., . Linking innovation to the public sector: contexts, concepts and challenges. In V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos ; Steijn, B. (Eds.). Innovation in the public sector linking capacity and leadership (pp. 3-32). London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307520
STOJCIC, N.; HASHI, I.; ORLIC, E. Creativity, innovation effectiveness and productive efficiency in the UK. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(4), 564–580, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2017-0166
SWANN, W. L. Modelling the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, organizational integration, and programme performance in local sustainability performance in local sustainability. Public Management Review, 19(4), 542-565, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1199729
TIDD, J.. Innovation management in context: environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 171(3), 169–183, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.037
TIDD, J.; BESSANT, J. Gestão da Inovação. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2015.
TREMML, T. Linking two worlds? Entrepreneurial orientation in public enterprises: a systematic review and research agenda. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 90(1), 25–51, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12214
TRINDADE, A. Estado, governança e segurança pública no Brasil: Uma análise das secretarias estaduais de Segurança Pública. DILEMAS: Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social, 8(4), 607–632, 2015.
VASILEIOU, K. et a Understanding innovators’ experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-342