Entrepreneurial orientation in the Federal Police – stimuli and restrictions based on organizational characteristics
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Police organizations have moved towards incorporating more efficient procedures with a view to improving the services provided. In this sense, the study of entrepreneurial orientation and the identification of organizational characteristics that act as inducers or inhibitors of this behavior gain in relevance. Entrepreneurial orientation has been little studied in police organizations. In this sense, the present work aims to analyze the relationship between characteristics present in the organization and the entrepreneurial orientation of public servants. In order to achieve the proposed objective, primary information was collected from 321 Federal Police delegates using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed with exploratory factor analysis and multiple regression analysis. The results found show the relevance of leadership for proactivity and for the propensity to take risks on the part of the delegates. Additionally, it was observed that the provision of qualification and training was associated with risk propensity, however not with proactivity. Contrary to expectations, the presence of norms and rules did not prove to be an obstacle to entrepreneurial orientation, but a stimulus to risk.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal has exclusive rights over the first publication, printed and/or digital, of this academic text, which does not affect the copyright of the person responsible for the research.
The reproduction (in whole or in part) of the published material depends on the express mention of this journal as the origin, by citing the volume, edition number and the DOI link for cross-reference. For rights purposes, the original publication source must be recorded.
The use of the results published here in other vehicles of scientific divulgation, even if by the authors, depends on the express indication of this journal as a means of original publication, under penalty of characterizing a situation of self-plagiarism.
____________________________________________
Additional information and author statements
(scientific integrity)
Declaration of conflict of interest: The author(s) confirm that there are no conflicts of interest in conducting this research and writing this article.
Authorship statement: All and only researchers who meet the authorship requirements for this article are listed as authors; all co-authors are fully responsible for this work in its entirety.
Declaration of originality: The author(s) guarantee that the text published here has not been previously published elsewhere and that future republication will only be made with express reference to the original place of publication; also certifies that there is no plagiarism of third-party material or self-plagiarism.
____________________________________________
Archiving and distribution
The final published PDF can be archived, without restrictions, on any open access server, indexer, repository or personal page, such as Academia.edu and ResearchGate.
How to Cite
References
AHMAD, N.; DAGHFOUS, A. Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational knowledge networks. European Business Review, 22(2), 153–174, 2010. https://doi.org/DOI10.1108/09555341011023506
ALENCAR, E. Desenvolvendo a Criatividade nas Organizações: O Desafio da Inovação. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 35, n. 6, p. 6–11, 1995. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0034-75901995000600002&script=sci_arttext.
ATTARD, J. et al.; . A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 2015. 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006
BESSANT, J.; TIDD, J.. Inovação e empreendedorismo: administração. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2009.
BRUNO-FARIA, M. de F.; FONSECA, M. V. de A.). Culture of Innovation: Concepts and Theoretical Models. RAC-Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), 18(4), 2014. 372–396. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac20141025.
BRYMAN, A. Social Research Methods, 3. ed., Oxford University Press, 2008.
BURNS, P.. Corporate Entrepreneurship: Building an Entrepreneurial Organization. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008.
CARUANA, A.; EWING, M. T.; RAMASESHAN, B. Effects of some environmental challenges and centralization on the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of public sector entities. Service Industries Journal, 22(2), 43–58, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/714005076
CASTRO, C. M. S. et alAntecedentes de inovações em organizações públicas do poder executivo federal. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 22(71), 2017. 126–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v22n71.63851
CHAN, K. Y. et al.; Who wants to be an intrapreneur? Relations between employees’ entrepreneurial, professional, and leadership career motivations and intrapreneurial motivation in organizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2041. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02041
COELHO, M. L. G. M. M. Intraempreendedorismo e a inovação na gestão pública federal. Revista do Serviço Público, 61(3), 2010. 233–247.
COSTA, A. M.; CERICATO, D.; MELO, P. A. de.. Empreendedorismo corporativo: uma nova estratégia para a inovação em organizações contemporâneas. Revista de Negócios, 12(4), 32–43, 2007.
COSTA FILHO, E.; GOMES, M. A. de; TEIXEIRA, R. M. Ações Empreendedoras Inovadoras no Setor Público. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação, 5(2), 2018. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18226/23190639.v5n2.01
CURADO, C.; MUÑOZ-PASCUAL, L.; GALENDE, J. Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Business Research, 89, 206–215, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.056
DE VRIES, H.; BEKKERS, V.; TUMMERS, L. Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 2016. 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
DEMIRCIOGLU, M. A.; AUDRETSCH, D. B. Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 2017.1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004
EMMENDOERFER, M. L. . Inovação e Empreendedorismo no Setor Público. ENAP: Brasília, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4236805
EMMENDOERFER, M. L. Innovation, Brazil. In A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer., 2019b. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3764-1
EMMENDOERFER, M. L.; VALADARES, J. L.; HASHIMOTO, M. Evidências do empreendedorismo interno em organizações no contexto da inovação. RECADM - Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa, 9(2), 144–156, 2010.. https://doi.org/10.5329/RECADM.20100902002
FERREIRA, V. D. R. S. et al. Inovação no setor público federal no brasil na perspectiva da inovação em serviços. Review of Administration and Innovation - RAI, 12(4), 2015. 99. https://doi.org/10.11606/rai.v12i4.101521
FONSECA, F. A trama conflituosa das políticas públicas: Lógicas e projetos em disputa. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 14, 406–417, 2016. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-395162646
GARCÍABUADES, M. E.; RAMISPALMER, C.; MANASSEROMAS, M. A. Climate for innovation, performance, and job satisfaction of local police in Spain. Policing, 38(4), 722–737, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-02-2015-0019
GASCÓ, M. Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90–98, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.003
HADJIMANOLIS, A. The barriers approach to innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (ed.). The International Handbook on Innovation (pp. 559-573). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50038-3
HANSEN, M. B. Antecedents of organizational innovation: The diffusion of new public management into Danish local government. Public Administration, 89(2), 285–306, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01855.x
HAIR JR, J. F. et al Análise Multivariada de Dados. 6o ed. Bookman Editora, 2009.
HARTLEY, J. Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money & Management, v. 25, n. 1, p. 27–34, 2005.
HÉBERT, R. F.; LINK, A. N.. In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small business economics, 1(1), 39-49, 1989.
HISRICH, R. D. Entrepreneurship / Intrapreneurship. American Psychologist, v. 45, n. 2, p. 209–222, 1990.
HOBBS, D.. Doing the business: Entrepreneurship, the Working Class, and Detectives in the East End of London. Oxford: OPU, 1988.
HOBBS, D.. Business as a Master-Metaphor: Working Class Entrepreneurship and Business Class Policing. In R. Burrows (ed.), Deciphering the Enterprise Culture (pp. 107-125). London: Routledge, 1991.
HORNSBY, J. S et al. An Interactive Model of the Corporate Entrepreneurship Process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, v. 17, n. 2, p. 29–37, 1993.
HUGHES, D. J. et al.. Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 2018. 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
KIM, D.; CHIOU, J. S.; CALANTONE, R. Strategic orientations, joint learning, and innovation generation in international customer-supplier relationships. International Business Review, 27(4), 838–851, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.01.007
KARYOTAKIS, K.; MOUSTAKIS, V. Organizational factors, organizational culture, job satisfaction and entrepreneurial orientation in public administration. The European Journal of Applied Economics, 13(1), 2016. 47–59. https://doi.org/10.5937/ejae13-10781
KEARNEY, C.; HISRICH, R.; ROCHE, F. A conceptual model of public sector corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(3), 295– 313, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-007-0048-x
KEARNEY, C.; HISRICH, R.; ROCHE, F. Public and private sector entrepreneurship: Similarities, differences or a combination? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16(1), 26–46, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000910932863
KEARNEY, C.; MEYNHARDT, T. Directing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy in the Public Sector to Public Value – Antecedents, Components and Outcomes. International Public Management Journal, 19(4), 543–572, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1160013
KIRZNER, I. M.. Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago: CUP, 1983.
KNIGHT, F. H.. Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: August M. Kelley, 1921.
LACERDA, F. M.; BELFORT, A. C.; MARTENS, C. D. P. Manifestação da orientação mpreendedora em uma organização sem fins lucrativos. REGEPE - Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 4(2), 66–95, 2015.
LEE, J. C.; CHEN, C. Y. Exploring the determinants of software process improvement success: A dynamic capability view. Information Development. 31(1), 6-20, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666917724194
LEWIS, J. M.; RICARD, L. M.; KLIJN, E. H. How innovation drivers, networking and leadership shape public sector innovation capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 288–307, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317694085
LEYDEN, D. P.; Link, A. N.. Public sector entrepreneurship: U. S. technology and innovation policy. New York: OPU, 2015.
LUKOSCHEK, C. S. et al.;. Leading to sustainable organizational unit performance: Antecedents and outcomes of executives’ dual innovation leadership. Journal of Business Research, 91, 266–276, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.003
MACHADO, D. D. P. N.; CARVALHO, L. C. de.. Ambiente favorável ao desenvolvimento de inovações: proposição de um modelo de análise organizacional. Revista de Administração, 48(3), 592–607, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1108
MCMULLEN, J. S.; SHEPHERD, D. A. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, v. 31, n. 1, p. 132–152, 2006.
MEYNHARDT, T.; DIEFENBACH, F. E. What Drives Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Public Sector? Evidence from Germany s Federal Labor Agency. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 2012. 761–792. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus013
MORAIS, M. C. A et al.. Meta-Análise da Produção Científica Internacional sobre Empreendedorismo no Setor Público: O que tem sido escrito acerca disso? XXXVI Encontro ANPAD, p. 1–16, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.anpad.org.br/admin/pdf/2013_EnANPAD_APB1645.pdf
MORAIS, M. C. A. et al; (2015). Polissemias do Empreendedorismo no Setor Público. REGEPE - Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 4(1), 26–53, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14211/41200
MORRIS, M. H.; JONES, F. F. Entrepreneurship in Established Organizations: The Case of the Public Sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 71–91, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902400105
MORRIS, M. H.; WEBB, J. W.; FRANKLIN, R. J. Understanding the manifestation of entrepreneurial orientation in the nonprofit context. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(5), 947–971, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00453.x
MÜCELDILI, B.; TURAN, H.; ERDIL, O. The influence of authentic leadership on creativity and innovativeness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 673–681, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.538
MUNRO, J. Accelerating innovation in local government. Public Money ; Management, 35(3), 219–226, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.1027498
NIEVES, J.; HALLER, S. Building dynamic capabilities through knowledge resources. Tourism Management, 40, 224–232, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.010
OHEMENG, F. L. K. The Entrepreneurial Bureaucrat. In A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5
PALMER, D. State police in a state of change: remaking the entrepreneurial officer (Doctoral dissertation, Griffith University), 2005.
PIKKEMAAT, B.; PETERS, M.; CHAN, C. S. Needs, drivers and barriers of innovation: The case of an alpine community-model destination. Tourism Management Perspectives, 25, 2018. 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.11.004
POPA, S.; SOTO-ACOSTA, P.; MARTINEZ-CONESA, I. Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 134–142, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.014
REGO, A. et al.. Hope and positive affect mediating the authentic leadership and creativity relationship. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 2014. 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.10.003
SCHUMPETER, J. A.). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: HUP, 1934.
SEABRA, S. N. A nova administração pública e mudanças organizacionais. Revista de Administração Pública, 35(4), 19–43, 2001.
SECCHI, L. Modelos organizacionais e reformas da administração pública. Revista de Administração Pública, 43(2), 2009.347–369. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122009000200004
SILVA, J. A. DA. (2007) Curso de direito constitucional positivo. 28o ed. São Paulo: Malheiros Editores.
SILVA, M. V. G. et al.. Intraempreendedorismo no Setor Público: Análise do Comportamento Empreendedor de Gestores Públicos Municipais por Meio do Carland Entrepreneurship Index (CEI). REGEPE - Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 7(2), 2018. 67–114. https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v7i2.699
SINGLA, A.; STRITCH, J. M.; FEENEY, M. K. Constrained or creative? Changes in financial condition and entrepreneurial orientation in public organizations. Public Administration, 96(4), 2018. 769–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12540
SMITH, R. The evolution of “entrepreneurial policing”: a review of the literature. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 9(1), 1-20, 2020.. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-03-2019-0005
STEIJN, B.; BEKKERS, V.; EDELENBOS, J., . Linking innovation to the public sector: contexts, concepts and challenges. In V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos ; Steijn, B. (Eds.). Innovation in the public sector linking capacity and leadership (pp. 3-32). London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307520
STOJCIC, N.; HASHI, I.; ORLIC, E. Creativity, innovation effectiveness and productive efficiency in the UK. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(4), 564–580, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2017-0166
SWANN, W. L. Modelling the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, organizational integration, and programme performance in local sustainability performance in local sustainability. Public Management Review, 19(4), 542-565, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1199729
TIDD, J.. Innovation management in context: environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 171(3), 169–183, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.037
TIDD, J.; BESSANT, J. Gestão da Inovação. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2015.
TREMML, T. Linking two worlds? Entrepreneurial orientation in public enterprises: a systematic review and research agenda. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 90(1), 25–51, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12214
TRINDADE, A. Estado, governança e segurança pública no Brasil: Uma análise das secretarias estaduais de Segurança Pública. DILEMAS: Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social, 8(4), 607–632, 2015.
VASILEIOU, K. et a Understanding innovators’ experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-342