Security, Contribution by the Copenhagen School
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Security is something that is part of the discursive lexicon, however it is not always an easy topic to approach and conceptualize. The aim of this essay is to reflect on the contribution of the Copenhagen School to the concept of security. We resorted to a narrative review of the literature, exposing a constructivist approach to the way in which security is faced.We focus on what is und erstood as security for the Copenhagen School, its epistemological approach, the basic idea of security as well as the analysis tools that its precursors forged. We intend to present the main contents of this school and name the essential elements for this theoretical current that has the speech act as a precursor. We intend to assess what is understood as a security concept for the Copenhagen School, going beyond the traditional - military. In this sequence, we develop an approach of the concepts proposed by this in international security in the approach to regional security complexes. The proposition that seeks in the theory of securitization allied to the concept of security in an expansion to other sectors, conceiving it beyond the traditional military, encompassing the political, economic, social and environmental sectors. Also more recent is the proposal of sectorization to the cybernetic field.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal has exclusive rights over the first publication, printed and/or digital, of this academic text, which does not affect the copyright of the person responsible for the research.
The reproduction (in whole or in part) of the published material depends on the express mention of this journal as the origin, by citing the volume, edition number and the DOI link for cross-reference. For rights purposes, the original publication source must be recorded.
The use of the results published here in other vehicles of scientific divulgation, even if by the authors, depends on the express indication of this journal as a means of original publication, under penalty of characterizing a situation of self-plagiarism.
____________________________________________
Additional information and author statements
(scientific integrity)
Declaration of conflict of interest: The author(s) confirm that there are no conflicts of interest in conducting this research and writing this article.
Authorship statement: All and only researchers who meet the authorship requirements for this article are listed as authors; all co-authors are fully responsible for this work in its entirety.
Declaration of originality: The author(s) guarantee that the text published here has not been previously published elsewhere and that future republication will only be made with express reference to the original place of publication; also certifies that there is no plagiarism of third-party material or self-plagiarism.
____________________________________________
Archiving and distribution
The final published PDF can be archived, without restrictions, on any open access server, indexer, repository or personal page, such as Academia.edu and ResearchGate.
How to Cite
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with Words The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955 (Oxford University Press (ed.)). https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839429693-021
Balzacq, T. (2005). The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105052960
Barrinha, A. (2013). Debates críticos: os Estudos de Segurança e o futuro dos Estudos da Paz e dos Conflitos. Universitas: Relações Internacionais, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.5102/uri.v11i2.2526
Berenskoetter, F. (2017). Approaches to concept analysis. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 45(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816651934
Brandão, A. P. (2015). A UE e o terrorismo transnacional: securitizing move e ator normativo, uma contradição nos termos? In A. Barrinha & M. R. Freire (Eds.), Segurança, liberdade e política: Pensar a escola de copenhaga em português (1.a, pp. 45–78). ICS - Imprensa de ciências socias.
Buzan, B. (1991). People, States and Fear: an Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2008). Book review: The Global Transformation. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 24(4), 321–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10548400802156836
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and Powers. Cambridge Studies In International Relations, 91.
Buzan, B., Waever, O., & Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
C.A.S.E. Collective. (2006). Critical approaches to security in Europe: A networked manifesto. Security Dialogue, 37(4), 443–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606073085
Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (2013). International Relations Theories (Issue 9). Oxford University Press.
Griffiths, M., & O’Callaghan, T. (2002). International Relations: The Key Concepts. In International Relations: The Key Concepts. Routlege. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203748206
Guzzini, S. (2013). The ends of International Relations theory: Stages of reflexivity and modes of theorizing. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494327
Guzzini, S. (2015). A história dual da securitização. In A. Barrinha & M. R. Freire (Eds.), Segurança, liberdade e política: Pensar a escola de copenhaga em português (1.a, pp. 15–32). ICS - Imprensa de ciências socias.
Hansen, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Digital disaster, cyber security, and the copenhagen school. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 1155–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00572.x
Jackson, R., & Sorensen, G. (2013). Introduction to International Relations - Theorie and Approches (Fifth). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118574362.ch8
Koselleck, R. (2014). Estratos do Tempo - Estudos Sobre História (Hediger Markus Traduçao (ed.); 1.a-Bras). Contraponto.
Kratochwil, F. (1989). Rules, Norms, and Decision: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge University Press.
Mcsweeney, B. (1996). Identity and security: Buzan and the Copenhagen school. Review of International Studies, 22(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118467
Onuf, N. (1989). World of Our Making. In R. Little, I. B. Neumann, & J. Weldes (Eds.), World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (2013th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203722428
Saraiva, J. F. S. (2007). História das relações internacionais contemporâneas: da sociedade internacional do Século XIX à era da globalização (2.a). Editora Saraiva. https://1drv.ms/b/s!Aq69qFkOJZB-qnHHgp8h7y6qvn1e
Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053.
Silva, C. C. V. e, & Pereira, A. E. (2019). A Teoria de Securitização e a sua aplicação em artigos publicados em periódicos científicos. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 27(69). https://doi.org/10.1590/1678987319276907
Tucídides. (2001). História da guerra de Peloponeso (IPRI - Universidade de Brasilia (ed.); 4.a). Imprensa Oficial do Estado de São Paulo.
Walker, R. B. J. (2007). Security, critique, Europe. Security Dialogue, 38(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607075974
Weaver, O. (1995). Securitization and Desecuritization. In R. Lipschutz (Ed.), On Security (pp. 46–86). Columbia University Press.
Weaver, O., Buzan, B., & Kelstrup, M. (1993). Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. Pinter-Centre for Peace and Conflict Research.