Orientation entrepreneuriale dans la police fédérale – stimuli et restrictions en fonction des caractéristiques organisationnelles
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
Les organisations policières ont évolué vers l'intégration de procédures plus efficaces afin d'améliorer les services fournis. En ce sens, l'étude de l'orientation entrepreneuriale et l'identification des caractéristiques organisationnelles qui agissent comme inducteurs ou inhibiteurs de ce comportement gagnent en pertinence. L'orientation entrepreneuriale est encore peu étudiée dans les organisations policières. En ce sens, le présent travail vise à analyser la relation entre les caractéristiques présentes dans l'organisation et l'orientation entrepreneuriale des fonctionnaires. Pour atteindre l'objectif proposé, des informations primaires ont été recueillies auprès de 321 agents de la police fédérale à l'aide d'un questionnaire structuré. Les données ont été analysées à l'aide d'une analyse factorielle exploratoire et d'une analyse de régression multiple. Les résultats trouvés montrent l'importance du leadership pour la proactivité et pour la propension à prendre des risques de la part des délégués. En outre, il a été observé que l'offre de qualification et de formation était associée à la propension au risque, mais pas à la proactivité. Contrairement aux attentes, la présence de normes et de règles ne s'est pas révélée être un obstacle à l'orientation entrepreneuriale, mais plutôt un stimulant au risque.
Renseignements sur l'article
Rubrique
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
La revue a des droits exclusifs sur la première publication, imprimée et/ou numérique, de ce texte académique, qui n'affecte pas le droit d'auteur de la personne responsable de la recherche.
La reproduction (totale ou partielle) du matériel publié dépend de la mention expresse de cette revue comme origine, en citant le volume, le numéro d'édition et le lien DOI pour renvoi. Aux fins des droits, la source de publication originale doit être enregistrée.
L'utilisation des résultats publiés ici dans d'autres véhicules de divulgation scientifique, même par les auteurs, dépend de l'indication expresse de cette revue comme moyen de publication originale, sous peine de caractériser une situation d'auto-plagiat.
______________________________________________
Informations supplémentaires et déclarations de l'auteur
(intégrité scientifique)
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts : Le ou les auteurs confirment qu'il n'y a pas de conflits d'intérêts dans la conduite de cette recherche et la rédaction de cet article.
Déclaration de paternité : tous les chercheurs et uniquement ceux qui satisfont aux exigences de paternité de cet article sont répertoriés en tant qu'auteurs ; tous les co-auteurs sont entièrement responsables de ce travail dans son intégralité.
Déclaration d'originalité : le ou les auteurs garantissent que le texte publié ici n'a pas été publié auparavant ailleurs et que la future republication ne sera faite qu'avec une référence expresse au lieu de publication d'origine ; certifie également qu'il n'y a pas de plagiat de matériel tiers ou d'auto-plagiat.
______________________________________________
Archivage et diffusion
Le PDF final publié peut être archivé, sans restriction, sur n'importe quel serveur, indexeur, référentiel ou page personnelle en libre accès, comme Academia.edu et ResearchGate.
Comment citer
Références
AHMAD, N.; DAGHFOUS, A. Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational knowledge networks. European Business Review, 22(2), 153–174, 2010. https://doi.org/DOI10.1108/09555341011023506
ALENCAR, E. Desenvolvendo a Criatividade nas Organizações: O Desafio da Inovação. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 35, n. 6, p. 6–11, 1995. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0034-75901995000600002&script=sci_arttext.
ATTARD, J. et al.; . A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 2015. 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006
BESSANT, J.; TIDD, J.. Inovação e empreendedorismo: administração. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2009.
BRUNO-FARIA, M. de F.; FONSECA, M. V. de A.). Culture of Innovation: Concepts and Theoretical Models. RAC-Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), 18(4), 2014. 372–396. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac20141025.
BRYMAN, A. Social Research Methods, 3. ed., Oxford University Press, 2008.
BURNS, P.. Corporate Entrepreneurship: Building an Entrepreneurial Organization. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008.
CARUANA, A.; EWING, M. T.; RAMASESHAN, B. Effects of some environmental challenges and centralization on the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of public sector entities. Service Industries Journal, 22(2), 43–58, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/714005076
CASTRO, C. M. S. et alAntecedentes de inovações em organizações públicas do poder executivo federal. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 22(71), 2017. 126–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v22n71.63851
CHAN, K. Y. et al.; Who wants to be an intrapreneur? Relations between employees’ entrepreneurial, professional, and leadership career motivations and intrapreneurial motivation in organizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2041. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02041
COELHO, M. L. G. M. M. Intraempreendedorismo e a inovação na gestão pública federal. Revista do Serviço Público, 61(3), 2010. 233–247.
COSTA, A. M.; CERICATO, D.; MELO, P. A. de.. Empreendedorismo corporativo: uma nova estratégia para a inovação em organizações contemporâneas. Revista de Negócios, 12(4), 32–43, 2007.
COSTA FILHO, E.; GOMES, M. A. de; TEIXEIRA, R. M. Ações Empreendedoras Inovadoras no Setor Público. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação, 5(2), 2018. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18226/23190639.v5n2.01
CURADO, C.; MUÑOZ-PASCUAL, L.; GALENDE, J. Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Business Research, 89, 206–215, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.056
DE VRIES, H.; BEKKERS, V.; TUMMERS, L. Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 2016. 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
DEMIRCIOGLU, M. A.; AUDRETSCH, D. B. Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 2017.1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004
EMMENDOERFER, M. L. . Inovação e Empreendedorismo no Setor Público. ENAP: Brasília, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4236805
EMMENDOERFER, M. L. Innovation, Brazil. In A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer., 2019b. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3764-1
EMMENDOERFER, M. L.; VALADARES, J. L.; HASHIMOTO, M. Evidências do empreendedorismo interno em organizações no contexto da inovação. RECADM - Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa, 9(2), 144–156, 2010.. https://doi.org/10.5329/RECADM.20100902002
FERREIRA, V. D. R. S. et al. Inovação no setor público federal no brasil na perspectiva da inovação em serviços. Review of Administration and Innovation - RAI, 12(4), 2015. 99. https://doi.org/10.11606/rai.v12i4.101521
FONSECA, F. A trama conflituosa das políticas públicas: Lógicas e projetos em disputa. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 14, 406–417, 2016. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-395162646
GARCÍABUADES, M. E.; RAMISPALMER, C.; MANASSEROMAS, M. A. Climate for innovation, performance, and job satisfaction of local police in Spain. Policing, 38(4), 722–737, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-02-2015-0019
GASCÓ, M. Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90–98, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.003
HADJIMANOLIS, A. The barriers approach to innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (ed.). The International Handbook on Innovation (pp. 559-573). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50038-3
HANSEN, M. B. Antecedents of organizational innovation: The diffusion of new public management into Danish local government. Public Administration, 89(2), 285–306, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01855.x
HAIR JR, J. F. et al Análise Multivariada de Dados. 6o ed. Bookman Editora, 2009.
HARTLEY, J. Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money & Management, v. 25, n. 1, p. 27–34, 2005.
HÉBERT, R. F.; LINK, A. N.. In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small business economics, 1(1), 39-49, 1989.
HISRICH, R. D. Entrepreneurship / Intrapreneurship. American Psychologist, v. 45, n. 2, p. 209–222, 1990.
HOBBS, D.. Doing the business: Entrepreneurship, the Working Class, and Detectives in the East End of London. Oxford: OPU, 1988.
HOBBS, D.. Business as a Master-Metaphor: Working Class Entrepreneurship and Business Class Policing. In R. Burrows (ed.), Deciphering the Enterprise Culture (pp. 107-125). London: Routledge, 1991.
HORNSBY, J. S et al. An Interactive Model of the Corporate Entrepreneurship Process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, v. 17, n. 2, p. 29–37, 1993.
HUGHES, D. J. et al.. Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 2018. 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
KIM, D.; CHIOU, J. S.; CALANTONE, R. Strategic orientations, joint learning, and innovation generation in international customer-supplier relationships. International Business Review, 27(4), 838–851, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.01.007
KARYOTAKIS, K.; MOUSTAKIS, V. Organizational factors, organizational culture, job satisfaction and entrepreneurial orientation in public administration. The European Journal of Applied Economics, 13(1), 2016. 47–59. https://doi.org/10.5937/ejae13-10781
KEARNEY, C.; HISRICH, R.; ROCHE, F. A conceptual model of public sector corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(3), 295– 313, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-007-0048-x
KEARNEY, C.; HISRICH, R.; ROCHE, F. Public and private sector entrepreneurship: Similarities, differences or a combination? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16(1), 26–46, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000910932863
KEARNEY, C.; MEYNHARDT, T. Directing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy in the Public Sector to Public Value – Antecedents, Components and Outcomes. International Public Management Journal, 19(4), 543–572, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1160013
KIRZNER, I. M.. Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago: CUP, 1983.
KNIGHT, F. H.. Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: August M. Kelley, 1921.
LACERDA, F. M.; BELFORT, A. C.; MARTENS, C. D. P. Manifestação da orientação mpreendedora em uma organização sem fins lucrativos. REGEPE - Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 4(2), 66–95, 2015.
LEE, J. C.; CHEN, C. Y. Exploring the determinants of software process improvement success: A dynamic capability view. Information Development. 31(1), 6-20, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666917724194
LEWIS, J. M.; RICARD, L. M.; KLIJN, E. H. How innovation drivers, networking and leadership shape public sector innovation capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 288–307, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317694085
LEYDEN, D. P.; Link, A. N.. Public sector entrepreneurship: U. S. technology and innovation policy. New York: OPU, 2015.
LUKOSCHEK, C. S. et al.;. Leading to sustainable organizational unit performance: Antecedents and outcomes of executives’ dual innovation leadership. Journal of Business Research, 91, 266–276, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.003
MACHADO, D. D. P. N.; CARVALHO, L. C. de.. Ambiente favorável ao desenvolvimento de inovações: proposição de um modelo de análise organizacional. Revista de Administração, 48(3), 592–607, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1108
MCMULLEN, J. S.; SHEPHERD, D. A. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, v. 31, n. 1, p. 132–152, 2006.
MEYNHARDT, T.; DIEFENBACH, F. E. What Drives Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Public Sector? Evidence from Germany s Federal Labor Agency. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 2012. 761–792. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus013
MORAIS, M. C. A et al.. Meta-Análise da Produção Científica Internacional sobre Empreendedorismo no Setor Público: O que tem sido escrito acerca disso? XXXVI Encontro ANPAD, p. 1–16, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.anpad.org.br/admin/pdf/2013_EnANPAD_APB1645.pdf
MORAIS, M. C. A. et al; (2015). Polissemias do Empreendedorismo no Setor Público. REGEPE - Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 4(1), 26–53, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14211/41200
MORRIS, M. H.; JONES, F. F. Entrepreneurship in Established Organizations: The Case of the Public Sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 71–91, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902400105
MORRIS, M. H.; WEBB, J. W.; FRANKLIN, R. J. Understanding the manifestation of entrepreneurial orientation in the nonprofit context. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(5), 947–971, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00453.x
MÜCELDILI, B.; TURAN, H.; ERDIL, O. The influence of authentic leadership on creativity and innovativeness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 673–681, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.538
MUNRO, J. Accelerating innovation in local government. Public Money ; Management, 35(3), 219–226, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.1027498
NIEVES, J.; HALLER, S. Building dynamic capabilities through knowledge resources. Tourism Management, 40, 224–232, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.010
OHEMENG, F. L. K. The Entrepreneurial Bureaucrat. In A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5
PALMER, D. State police in a state of change: remaking the entrepreneurial officer (Doctoral dissertation, Griffith University), 2005.
PIKKEMAAT, B.; PETERS, M.; CHAN, C. S. Needs, drivers and barriers of innovation: The case of an alpine community-model destination. Tourism Management Perspectives, 25, 2018. 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.11.004
POPA, S.; SOTO-ACOSTA, P.; MARTINEZ-CONESA, I. Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 134–142, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.014
REGO, A. et al.. Hope and positive affect mediating the authentic leadership and creativity relationship. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 2014. 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.10.003
SCHUMPETER, J. A.). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: HUP, 1934.
SEABRA, S. N. A nova administração pública e mudanças organizacionais. Revista de Administração Pública, 35(4), 19–43, 2001.
SECCHI, L. Modelos organizacionais e reformas da administração pública. Revista de Administração Pública, 43(2), 2009.347–369. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122009000200004
SILVA, J. A. DA. (2007) Curso de direito constitucional positivo. 28o ed. São Paulo: Malheiros Editores.
SILVA, M. V. G. et al.. Intraempreendedorismo no Setor Público: Análise do Comportamento Empreendedor de Gestores Públicos Municipais por Meio do Carland Entrepreneurship Index (CEI). REGEPE - Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 7(2), 2018. 67–114. https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v7i2.699
SINGLA, A.; STRITCH, J. M.; FEENEY, M. K. Constrained or creative? Changes in financial condition and entrepreneurial orientation in public organizations. Public Administration, 96(4), 2018. 769–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12540
SMITH, R. The evolution of “entrepreneurial policing”: a review of the literature. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 9(1), 1-20, 2020.. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-03-2019-0005
STEIJN, B.; BEKKERS, V.; EDELENBOS, J., . Linking innovation to the public sector: contexts, concepts and challenges. In V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos ; Steijn, B. (Eds.). Innovation in the public sector linking capacity and leadership (pp. 3-32). London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307520
STOJCIC, N.; HASHI, I.; ORLIC, E. Creativity, innovation effectiveness and productive efficiency in the UK. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(4), 564–580, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2017-0166
SWANN, W. L. Modelling the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, organizational integration, and programme performance in local sustainability performance in local sustainability. Public Management Review, 19(4), 542-565, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1199729
TIDD, J.. Innovation management in context: environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 171(3), 169–183, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.037
TIDD, J.; BESSANT, J. Gestão da Inovação. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2015.
TREMML, T. Linking two worlds? Entrepreneurial orientation in public enterprises: a systematic review and research agenda. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 90(1), 25–51, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12214
TRINDADE, A. Estado, governança e segurança pública no Brasil: Uma análise das secretarias estaduais de Segurança Pública. DILEMAS: Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social, 8(4), 607–632, 2015.
VASILEIOU, K. et a Understanding innovators’ experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-342