O Controle da Atividade de Detetive Particular pela Polícia Federal como Garantia Fundamental
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
O presente artigo visa a apresentar ao leitor um panorama atual da fragilidade da legislação que regulamenta a atividade de investigação privada por detetive particular no Brasil, bem como dos riscos a que a sociedade se expõe em face do vácuo normativo existente, embora a matéria tenha sido tratada primeiramente pelo legislador no ano de 1957, ainda no governo Juscelino Kubitschek. Objetiva-se ainda chamar a atenção do leitor para a necessidade premente de regulamentação eficaz de atividade tão sensível e capaz de interferir nas liberdades individuais dos cidadãos violando direitos fundamentais relacionados à intimidade, vida privada, honra e imagem, frente ao crescimento vertiginoso do mercado no País, sem, contudo, cercear a capacidade de investigação de outros segmentos da sociedade, a exemplo da imprensa investigativa.
Article Details
The journal has exclusive rights over the first publication, printed and/or digital, of this academic text, which does not affect the copyright of the person responsible for the research.
The reproduction (in whole or in part) of the published material depends on the express mention of this journal as the origin, by citing the volume, edition number and the DOI link for cross-reference. For rights purposes, the original publication source must be recorded.
The use of the results published here in other vehicles of scientific divulgation, even if by the authors, depends on the express indication of this journal as a means of original publication, under penalty of characterizing a situation of self-plagiarism.
____________________________________________
Additional information and author statements
(scientific integrity)
Declaration of conflict of interest: The author(s) confirm that there are no conflicts of interest in conducting this research and writing this article.
Authorship statement: All and only researchers who meet the authorship requirements for this article are listed as authors; all co-authors are fully responsible for this work in its entirety.
Declaration of originality: The author(s) guarantee that the text published here has not been previously published elsewhere and that future republication will only be made with express reference to the original place of publication; also certifies that there is no plagiarism of third-party material or self-plagiarism.
____________________________________________
Archiving and distribution
The final published PDF can be archived, without restrictions, on any open access server, indexer, repository or personal page, such as Academia.edu and ResearchGate.
How to Cite
References
BOBBIO, Noberto. A Era dos Direitos. 9ª ed. Rio de Janeiro. Elsevier, 2004.
GALLI, Marcelo. Supremo autoriza membros do MP a grampear telefones e quebrar sigilo. Consultor Jurídico, conjur.com.br, 25 de abril de 2018.
GLORIA G. DRALLA; DEBORAH B. HONIG; DEBORAH PENNY PORT; SHAUNNE H. POWER, who’s watching the watchman-the regulation or non-regulation, of America’s Largest Law Enforcement Institution, the Private Police. 5 Golden Gate U.L. Rev. 433, 1975.
GOMES FILHO, Antônio Magalhães. Direto à prova no processo penal. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 1997.
MARMELSTEIN, George. Curso de direitos fundamentais. São Paulo: Altas, 2008.
SARLET, Ingo Wolfgang. A eficácia dos direitos fundamentais. 10ª Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2010.